WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressmen Thomas Massie and Jim Bridenstine issued the following statement:
According to the Congressional Record, Congressmen Daniel Webster and Richard Nugent, Members who voted against John Boehner as Speaker of the House, have been kicked off the Rules Committee. This retribution compromises the ability of Members of Congress to faithfully represent their constituents and subverts our representative democracy.
The Speaker must immediately reinstate these Members. No Member should be punished for voting according to his or her conscience.
We expect other Members of the House of Representatives to condemn this act of political retribution.
Massie was an outspoken opponent of the re-election of John Boehner as the speaker of the house. He was joined by 25 other congressman in voting against Boehner. Now many of those who voted against Boehner are facing retaliation from the speaker.
Boehner acknowledged the discipline of Webster and Nugent in a Mafioso sounding speech last Wednesday stating that they were removed, “Because of some of the activities on the floor…two of our members weren’t put back on the committee immediately…We’re going to have a family conversation,” Boehner said.
This has many Americans asking about the way things are being done in Washington. If congressman can be punished by the speaker for voting a specific way, then how can constituents be insured their congressmen are representing the will of the people, instead of voting based on fear, intimidation, and what looks like school yard bullying?
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Tuesday, Congressman Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced H.R. 86, the Safe Students Act, which would repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which was introduced by then senator Joseph Biden.
The Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA) of 1990 made it “unlawful for any individual to knowingly possess a firearm at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone.” In 1995, the Supreme Court held the GFSZA unconstitutional, which prompted Congress to amend the bill in 1996. The Supreme Court has not ruled on the constitutionality of the amended Act.
The amendment was added in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997 which was enacted September 30, 1996 at the urging of then US Attorney General, Janet Reno. These changes required that the firearm in question “has moved in or otherwise affects interstate commerce.” Virtually every firearm in circulation fits that description, so many believe this was just a semantics game to circumvent a Supreme Court Ruling
Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) in 2007, originally introduced the bill that Congressman Thomas Massie is now proposing to repeal the Federal Gun Free School Zone Act.
“Gun-free school zones are ineffective. They make people less safe by inviting criminals into target-rich, no-risk environments,” said Massie. “Gun-free zones prevent law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves, and create vulnerable populations that are targeted by criminals.”
There have been 202 school shootings in the United States since the Gun Free School Zones Act was passed in 1990. There hasn’t been one mass shooting in the United States any place, except “gun free zones”.
Representative Massie concluded: “A bigger federal government can’t solve this problem. Weapons bans and gun-free zones are unconstitutional. They do not and cannot prevent criminals or the mentally ill from committing acts of violence. But they often prevent victims of such violence from protecting themselves.”
We don’t send our children to schools without fire extinguishers. Sprinkler systems and fire extinguishers are mandatory for their safety, but only celebrities and politicians get armed guards.
Cosponsors on the bill include: Rep. Steven Palazzo (R-MS), Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-OK), and Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC).
Congressman Massie is Chairman of the Second Amendment Caucus in the 114th Congress.
Recently, our 4th Congressional District, Kentucky Representative Thomas Massie, said Congress should focus on reasserting “its power of the purse, an explicit authority the Constitution gives Congress to keep the Executive in check.” Congressman Massie is on point and our Country will benefit greatly when more members of the House of Representatives follow his instruction.
The U.S Constitution is the original contract with America. It is the job description for all our federal elected officials. All of our elected officials swear to uphold the U.S Constitution, but precious few follow through on their pledge.
To the extent our government is guided by the Constitution we have done extremely well. However, for many decades now, America has moved away from our guiding document and all the Constitutional restraints that America’s brilliant founders devised to keep government in check.
It was adherence to the principles of our Constitutional government that made America strong and prosperous and the envy of the entire world. Think about this folks. Our Country comprises only 5% of the world’s population and we are the most fortunate 5% on the planet. This is why we must continue to fight tenaciously to maintain our freedoms and way of life that is under vicious attack by the “Obama Administration” as well as by many Establishment “Republicans”.
So, what is this “Constitutional Government” that I mention? We will dwell on Article I, Section 8 of our venerable Constitution. This is the most important listing of Congressional Powers.
Article I-Section 8, specifies the powers limited to those listed and those that are “necessary and proper” to carry them out.
All other lawmaking powers are left to the individual States. As the “Father of the U.S. Constitution” James Madison explained: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce. … The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives and liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.”
The First Congress was still concerned that the limited nature of the federal government was not clear enough in the original Constitution so they adopted the Tenth Amendment, which reserves to the States, or to the people, all the powers not specifically granted to the federal government.
The most important of the specific that the Constitution enumerates is the power to set taxes, tariffs, and other means of raising federal revenue and to authorize the expenditure of all federal funds. In addition to the tax powers in Article I, the 16th amendment authorized Congress to establish a national income tax. The national income tax, implemented in 1913, went against our Founders’ original intent. Federal income taxes were proposed and implemented earlier in U.S history, but were always struck down as unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The power to appropriate federal funds is known as the “power of the purse”. It gives Congress great authority over the executive branch, which must appeal to Congress for all its funding. The federal government borrows money by issuing bonds. This creates a National Debt, which the United States is obligated to repay.
Since at least 1975, famous scholars and political scientists throughout the Western World have been proclaiming that “democracy” is dying. Many cite the decline of the United States as a major cause. And when we hear of the remedies of these experts, they warn that “we can’t go back to a simpler world.” First of all, we are a Republic and not a Democracy, but that is the subject for a different article.
There are grave undertones and connotations in the warning for Americans that “we can’t go back to a simpler world.” Ever since Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in the mid- 1930’s, equated the governmental principles in the Constitution with a “horse and buggy” society, we began to confuse principles and material goods in our thinking. The buggy is outmoded, but political principles are eternal. Neither time nor new technology alters them.
The complexity of social organization does indeed change. Our technologically sophisticated industrial society is much more complex than the agrarian society of America in the 1700’s. In this regard, that was “a simpler world.”
But the complexities of politics (and politics here meaning the science of governing) do not change much. The basic political problems confronting the Framers of our Constitution were as complex as our political problems today- perhaps more so, because they were striking off into the dangerous unknown, whereas all we need to do is return to the excellent highway that we were once on.
I am saying that our nation must climb up and stand on the high ground it once proudly held. The high ground is still there. The governmental system ordained in our Constitution is as appropriate for our nation today as it was for the America of 1789. I think you all will agree that it is even more desperately needed now than it was back then.
Right now, our United States Constitution is absolutely no threat to the form of government we are presently enduring . This is a shame and we must revert back to following the Constitution and devote ourselves to cutting down the size, cost, reach, and power of the Federal Government.
We must encourage our countrymen to elect constitutionalists of the same caliber as Congressman Thomas Massie. We need more elected leaders who take their oaths of office seriously and follow the Constitution. Believe me, Kentuckians have shown the rest of the Country that liberty is still very popular and, as President George Washington proclaimed: “Truth will ultimately prevail when pains are taken to bring it to the light.”
Truth will ultimately prevail when pains are taken to bring it to the light.
If we could get more leaders elected to Congress that will uphold the Constitution, we can turn things around. We don’t need a Revolution like our ancestors fought, we just need to get back to the Constitution.
A U.S Congress with enough constitutionalists could restore constitutional government, even if the President, and the Supreme Court fought Congress all the way.
Restoring constitutional government will be slower if the House has to do it all by themselves; but it can be done. Remember, only the House of Representatives can initiate revenue bills. The House, all by itself, cannot stop ObamaCare but the House can, all by itself, starve ObamaCare to death.
The House can abolish all funding for the out of control E.P.A and other federal regulatory agencies. And the House can do away with the Federal Department of Education and any and all Federal Programs simply by voting to defund them. Neither President Obama nor any other President can veto zeroes.
The House can stop all Foreign Aid, and, by withdrawing the money, force the President to bring our troops home from all the illegal, unjust, immoral, and unconstitutional wars across the globe.
It is thrilling to think of what truly free American people would do if we can get the Federal Government off our backs and out of our pockets.
We can shrink the Federal Government to 20% of its present size with a Congress adhering to the U.S Constitution and to 20% of its present cost.
There would then be an explosion of private building, producing, buying, selling, expanding, and creating new job opportunities of all sorts all over the Country.
We could create more private schools, colleges, and research laboratories; build more hospitals, nursing homes, and medical-care facilities. In short, there would be an explosion of prosperity.
So the solution to restoring the Constitution and revitalizing America relies on our countrymen electing more courageous Congressmen like Thomas Massie. It does require time, effort, and sacrifice to accomplish this goal, but not as much as it cost our Founding Fathers to win the blessings of Liberty for us in the first place.